15th December 2020

Panacea's input: FCA Consumer Investments Market review

Firstly, I would like to thank all those who gave up their time, in one case some 5 hours to fully complete the survey. Their thoughts and suggestions, all 314 of them were sent to the FCA on Monday 14th December. 

In the advisory world and beyond there is, sadly, much historically based cynicism regarding input to consultations. The ‘outcome, in very many adviser’s eyes, has been seen as already having been decided by the FCA.  

This consultation paper was lengthy, the form doesn’t work well, advisers must identify themselves (not seen as being conducive to getting those open and honest responses) and it’s is all very time consuming. 

Because of the reasons above and that advisers sometimes feel that they cannot engage with FCA consultations as they worry about anonymity, we wanted to assist with getting many different viewpoints.  It is important that advisers have their voices heard and we feel that it is important to the FCA that they receive your feedback. 

We have made advisers aware they should be under no illusion; this consultation paper is a serious document with serious ‘outcome’ possibility. It deserves their attention.

Therefore, Panacea has collated answers from all the advisers who contributed to your survey, answering only those questions they wanted to, via our community resource.

As I mentioned above, very many hours of input has gone into completing this survey by the advisers taking part, so I would hope this has some value to the FCA and that it will help shape better outcomes for consumers and those that advise them? It is a riveting read!

You can download a copy via this link, in the meantime let’s wait to see if anyone reads and learns

Panacea Surveys, Panacea Comment

Registration

Free Registration and CPD

Related Articles_

Are advisers losing visibility with the next generation?


Read More

Spot the Difference: 72,000 Names, But No Paraplanners


The FCA Register lists over 72,000 individuals across advice, mortgage, and compliance roles — yet not a single paraplanner in sight. Given the critical part paraplanners play in shaping advice outcomes, from research to report writing, many are questioning whether it’s time for formal recognition. Could adding paraplanners to the FCA Directory or introducing a competency sign-off process help clarify accountability, or would it add unnecessary cost and complexity — especially for outsourced providers?

Read More

Should Paraplanners Be More Formally Recognised by the FCA?


Many paraplanners have expressed a desire for their work to be recognised as a profession in its own right, rather than simply a support function. Formal recognition could support that aim, reinforcing standards, career pathways and professional identity. We’d welcome your thoughts — whether a paraplanners, advisers or compliance professional — on how best to strike the right balance.

Read More

Comments (1)

Thanks for that Derek. Interesting to read others responses...

Steven Farrall   17/12/2020   14:24

You need to be logged in to comment on this article