26th September 2016

FSCS Funding Review Survey

Panacea has put together a short survey of 11 questions, to ascertain adviser perspectives on the FSCS funding review which will hopefully highlight the issues that our industry is facing. We would appreciate if you could let us know your thoughts and opinions of the FSCS and the review.

Please note that entries are anonymous and once the results have been collated, they will then be sent to the FCA, FSCS and the TSC as well as the press.

Survey closes Friday 25th November 2016.
If you are unable to see the survey below please click here to open in a new browser window.

We thank you in advance for your input.

Panacea Surveys

Registration

Free Registration and CPD

Are advisers losing visibility with the next generation?

Spot the Difference: 72,000 Names, But No Paraplanners

The FCA Register lists over 72,000 individuals across advice, mortgage, and compliance roles — yet not a single paraplanner in sight. Given the critical part paraplanners play in shaping advice outcomes, from research to report writing, many are questioning whether it’s time for formal recognition. Could adding paraplanners to the FCA Directory or introducing a competency sign-off process help clarify accountability, or would it add unnecessary cost and complexity — especially for outsourced providers?

Should Paraplanners Be More Formally Recognised by the FCA?

Many paraplanners have expressed a desire for their work to be recognised as a profession in its own right, rather than simply a support function. Formal recognition could support that aim, reinforcing standards, career pathways and professional identity. We’d welcome your thoughts — whether a paraplanners, advisers or compliance professional — on how best to strike the right balance.

You need to be logged in to comment on this article

About Us

Read

Learn

Attend

Connect

My Panacea

Press Centre