10th December 2013

What makes a good pension?

Legal & General played host at our London head office recently to a debate on the topic of “what makes a good pension?” organised by The-Pensions-Net-Work. As is sometimes the way with these events, we enjoyed a mixture of the predictable rationalisations of behaviour and some enlightening new insights.

Things we’ve heard before included this short list, in order of importance:
1. Pay large enough contributions
2. Invest them well
3. Choose a plan with low charges                         

That’s good solid advice; even though in my view regulators and so called “consumer champions” sometimes get these the wrong way round. They tend to place too much emphasis on charges and forget that adequate contributions are the biggest driver of good outcomes.

GOVERNANCE
Interestingly another familiar concept appeared to feature at rather greater frequency than I’d heard before; that of governance. Several contributors stressed the need for pension schemes to have strong active governance, keeping the managers focussed on delivering what really matters to the beneficiaries. Nobody produced a magic bullet for what good governance meant, but the clarion call was there - every day we need to focus on what matters to the end customer.
It didn’t seem to matter whether the scheme was written under trust or as a contract based arrangement. Strong governance focussing on good outcomes is going to be key going forward.

ANNUITIES
And talking of outcomes, that will mean buying an annuity for most retirees. One speaker presented us with a new take on a piece of established wisdom on annuities. Those of us that sell lots of annuities know that, where the customer has a choice, most buy a level single life annuity with no provision for their spouse or civil partner after their death. And I for one have always believed that it was the simple rationale of extracting the maximum income in early years from an inadequate pension pot that drove this behaviour.                         

Research from a major annuity broker has shown that 40% of men asking to buy a single life annuity don’t even know that such a thing as a joint life pension is available! That’s a wake up call to all of us to re-double our efforts on customer communication and education, especially in that important pre-retirement period.
                       
CONSUMER RESEARCH
The-Pensions-Net-Work had also commissioned some new consumer research into savings preferences. A familiar comment (or should I say excuse) is that two thirds of those interviewed said they would be relying, at least in part, on their property in retirement. Yes, that old British love story with bricks and mortar.                        

But the researchers had posed a supplementary question “and how will you generate money from your house?” Amazingly, four in every hundred think that they are going to take in a lodger in their retirement years. I wonder how many years ago it was that they last shared accommodation with strangers? It’s charming how the passing years play tricks with our memories and leave us just remembering only the fun parts of those earlier care-free days, rather than the reality of a sink full of someone else’s dirty dishes.                         

Take my advice, the short cut to a good pension is paying larger contributions!
 
ADRIAN BOULDING
PENSIONS STRATEGY DIRECTOR, LEGAL & GENERAL

 

Pensions

Registration

Free Registration and CPD

Related Articles_

Square Mile Research: Talking opportunities and finding your edge


“One of the great things about fund management is things – companies, market structure, views on value and growth – are always changing. And as fund managers we are always learning.” Read the latest interview in Square Mile’s series with Neil Veitch, Global Investment Director at SVM Asset Management.

Read More

Time to do something about the FSCS levy


Some members have seen their FCA invoices rise by 80%. This and the cost of PI is compromising the very future of advice.

Read More

Faith Liversedge: The suit is dead. Long live the suit


Even if we’re shirted from the waist up while on our Zoom calls, we’re more than likely to be stretchy panted down below.

Read More

Comments (4)

Why does this industry make a very simple concept so difficult? A DC pension is no more than a pot of money which is used to generate an income. As the author quite rightly says far too much attention is focused on charges and not enough on the level and frequency of contributions. These are a damn sight more important.

jamie cassidy   16/12/2013   10:03
The title was a bit misleading, but when one saw the author the choice of the two options in response became clear.

A good pension is paying larger contributions! Mr Boulding would say that; wouldnt he?

So you pay larger contributions into his Stakeholder or PP and get limited to 10 funds. Great idea!

It never seems to occur to these pension Gurus that a pension is nothing more than a long term investment with a few knobs added. As such requirement No.1 is a great fund choice.

Followed by

A terrific website
Good and timely documentation
Willingness and the ability to process paper applications efficiently.
First class service with dedicated points of contact who know what they are about.
Naturally free switching, reasonable charges (these dont have to be the lowest on the market (see above)
If possible non-insured funds (a la Skandia).

When you look at this list and compare it to L&G offering it is sad to say they tick only one of the boxes.(Charges)

When it comes to what an individual should do:

1. Dont put all your savings eggs in one basket. A pension is part of the equation. They should never be the only answer.
2. Dont ignore your ISA allowance
3. If you have resources left after 1 & 2 start looking at other investments. Direct stocks & shares, Insurance bonds, even property.
4. Always remember that savings and investments are a political football and our inept governments (of all complexions) maladroitly fiddle with the rules on an almost daily basis.

Norwest   16/12/2013   10:21
I know I shouldn't get so wound up but I just can't help it!

The government and insurance companies often seem to forget that we are businesses that need to make money to pay ourselves, meet our overheads, pay fees, levies, tax etc and that the majority of our clients do not want to dip their hands into their wallets or bank accounts to pay us for our advice.

Cheap pension policies are what they say on the tin - cheap. Remember how the government introduced stakeholder pensions because the only reason that people weren't putting money into pensions was the high level of charges?

I like to try to get across to clients that charges should account for no more than 20% of the reason behind selecting a pension provider. The remaining 80% should be investment performance.

Of course, finding the right funds and reviewing them on a regular basis is essential and that is where the services of a good adviser come to the fore.

How much should you put in? Certainly not more than you can afford and certainly more than you originally thought of. Give me a good projection tool that allows me to show, in today's term, what could be achieved without 20 pages of caveats and I'll explain it to a client. That's also what we are supposed to be good at - explaining things to people. Haven't we been told over thousands of years that this is a people business and that clients buy us, not policies. (Think about that L&G!)

All we need is money (so don't ask us for a stakeholder) and good, efficient, easy to use and consistent tools.

Annuities? Drawdown? Don't even start to think about them yet - the government will have fiddled about with them enough that they won't be the same when you retire.

In fact, the government will have fiddled about with everything enough to probably ensure that I will have given up advising about pensions long before you retire or the regulators will make it that expensive for me to offer you advice that I will have retrained as a civil servant!

Philip Bray   16/12/2013   11:41
And there's not necessarily owt wrong with charges.

When Friends' Prov was a mutual, their Stewardship Fund charged 6% initial charge instead of the market 5%, yet the extra expertise and research they did resulted in the fund out performing many funds which only charged 5%.

The so-called consumer champions want to sell magazines, so they concentrate on shock/horror/probe tactics, which the BBC is happy to publicise. I fail to see how that makes them consumer champions.

Richard Brown   16/12/2013   16:34

You need to be logged in to comment on this article