26th February 2025

FCA at it again

In a recent letter sent to ceo’s the FCA said it would be carrying out ‘supervisory work’ on mortgage advisers over the next couple of years. 

This included looking at whether “sufficient assessment of customer circumstances is being carried out, and whether the advice being given is suitable”.

It also said it would assess to which extent firms were ensuring customers understand the products available to them.

Additionally, this supervisory work seems to focus on the “adequacy of firms’ systems and controls, and quality assurance procedures to ensure there is consistency in the advice given and appropriate oversight to mitigate risks of harm.”

I have been working within this industry for a long time and have survived, if that is the right word, the oversights of NASDIM, Fimbra, PIA, FSA and now FCA attempts at keeping regulation relevant, simple ideally and something that the consumer can understand. 

I do wonder if such a 2 year review is really needed? We live in such a regulated world it seems madness to me that part of the advice process has to now focus on whether the client/ customer is stupid.

They are saying for example that:

  1. the risks of secured lending should be featured prominently alongside the promoted benefits
  2. firms should not be seeking to exploit consumers’ behavioural biases 
  3. communications should be designed in a way that avoids foreseeable harm and aids consumer understanding

The warnings attached to mortgage products are everywhere!

Is it me? Given the hoops that have to be jumped through, by homebuyers today to actually get an affordable mortgage, and, advisers who are qualified and regulated to assist over all these years, are we to assume that the regulator concludes that consumers are now so stupid that they need protecting from themselves!

Just a thought? Do let me have yours?

 

I would comment on the article, but doing so under my own name has recently lead to some awkwardness (shall we say).  Probably because I have been hyper- and publicly critical of the FCA since its inception.

 Anyway. I thought that it might be instructional to add this link to the comments -https://mises.org/mises-daily/seven-rules-bureaucracy 

 The FCA is spouting off about mortgage advisers because of Rules #1 (certainly) and #3 and #5.

 It is simply the SOP of all utterly unaccountable totally self-serving bureaucracies through all of time.

Comment source verified and anon as requested

Regulation

Registration

Free Registration and CPD

Related Articles_

YouGov: Are Consumers Getting Better Outcomes as a Result of the Consumer Duty?


Nearly three years after the introduction of Consumer Duty, are firms delivering the improved outcomes the FCA intended? Drawing on insights from more than 65,000 UK consumer interviews, this on-demand webinar from YouGov explores how perceptions of financial services have evolved since implementation. Discover which sectors and brands are leading the way, where gaps remain, and how different customer groups, including vulnerable consumers and younger generations, view their experiences today. Gain valuable insight into the latest Consumer Duty trends and what they could mean for firms looking to strengthen customer outcomes.

Read More

Panacea Conversations - Beyond the Questionnaire: Rethinking Attitude to Risk


Attitude to Risk is one of the foundations of good financial planning, yet it’s often reduced to a questionnaire and a risk score. In the latest episode of Panacea Conversations, compliance expert Tony Catt explains why the real value lies in the conversations behind the questionnaire. We explore adviser bias, client psychology, capacity for loss, vulnerability, and why risk shouldn’t be viewed solely through an investment lens. If you want to strengthen your Attitude to Risk process, this is a conversation worth hearing.

Read More

Panacea Conversations - Beyond the Questionnaire: Rethinking Attitude to Risk


In this episode of Panacea Conversations, we explore one of the most fundamental, and often misunderstood, aspects of the advice process: Attitude to Risk.

Read More

You need to be logged in to comment on this article